Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Allen v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 31, 2000No. 92P-20981; CA A105550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Father appeals from a modification judgment that increased his child support obligation. He argues that the court erred in departing from the presumptive support obligation. We reverse and remand.

The original dissolution judgment required father to pay $144.52 per month in child support. In 1997, mother moved to modify the amount of child support. After a hearing, the trial court found that the child spent approximately 65 percent of her time with mother and 35 percent with father. Based on that figure and the parties’ respective incomes, the court found that father’s presumptive child…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LarkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. In re the Marriage of WesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. In re the Marriage of WinnieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Brandstorm, Inc. v. Global Sterilization and Fumigation, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2019
  3. Theodore Leach, et al. v. Dennett Ingram, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API