Merrill v. Merrill
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
On August 29, 1887, a written contract was executed by and between F. H. Merrill, Otto Froelich, and 0. T. Hopkins, by the terms of which Merrill agreed to sell to Froelich an undivided one-sixth part in the south half of the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of section 21, township 2 south, range 13 west, San Bernadino base and meridian, known as the “ Merrill and Hancock tract,” and “ being the interest to which said Merrill is entitled under the will of his late father, Ed. Merrill, deceased, for the sum of twelve thousand five hundred dollars, to be paid as follows”:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Newton v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Englander v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Dennis v. StrassburgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Dowd v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Merrill v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Allsopp v. Joshua Hendy Machine WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.