Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Strassburger

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1891No. 13151PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Garoutte,

action is brought to recover eight hundred dollars as a deposit and part payment of out*586side lands, block 986, in the city and county of San Francisco, under a contract, in writing, set forth in the complaint, as follows:—

“ I. Strassburger & Co.,
“Deal Estate Agents, 326£ Montgomery Street, Safe Deposit Building.
“ San Francisco, August 22, 1887.
“ Received of S. W. Dennis eight hundred dollars as a deposit and in part payment of the following property, being situate in the city and county of San Francisco, and state of California, and more particularly described as follows, to wit: O.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Englander v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Barron v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Foxley v. RichUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Seeburg v. El Royale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API