Legal Opinion · Dissent

Searchtoppers.com, L.L.C. v. TrustCash LLC

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 20, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 11-0171Published

1DissentOrozco, Judge

¶ 25 Because I agree with BYS Inc. v. Smoudi, 228 Ariz. 573, 578, ¶ 20, 269 P.3d 1197, 1202 (App.2012) and believe a party who has appeared when damages are liquidated is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)2,1 respectfully dissent.

¶ 26 A defendant in a civil action must respond within twenty days after service of the summons and complaint. Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). If the defendant “has failed to plead or otherwise defend” within twenty days, the plaintiff may file an application for entry of default. Ariz. R. Civ. P. 55(a).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. TapoArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Austin v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Tarr v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bys Inc. v. SmoudiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Estate of Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API