United States v. Jim
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Derrick Ivan Jim’s Opposed Motion in Lemini [sic] to Exclude All Admissions and Statements Made by Defendant in the Course of His Change of Plea to Guilty to Judge Paglisi [sic], in His Plea Agreement and to Probation, filed December 20, 2011 (Doc. 72)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on December 30, 2011. The primary issue is whether the Court should exclude at trial Jim’s statements: (i) in the Plea Agreement; (ii) during the plea colloquy; and (iii) to the United States…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. JimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. YazzieDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- United States v. BlattnerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016