Legal Opinion
United States v. Jim
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2015No. 12-2085, 12-2120PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Derrick Jim of aggravated sexual abuse occurring in the Navajo Nation. Jim initially pled guilty to this offense, but later withdrew his plea and proceeded to trial. On appeal, Jim claims that the trial court erred when it let the Government present to the jury evidence of the admissions he made in his plea agreement and during his plea colloquy. Ordinarily, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence precludes the Government from using such evidence against a defendant. But Jim waived his Rule 410 protections as part of the plea agreement underlying his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. KiefferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Sanchez-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Hernandez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. KutzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Luke Scott, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.