Legal Opinion
Benco Plastics, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided July 19, 1974No. Civ. A. 8317 and 8457PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.
Introduction
This action is a consolidation of cases 8317 and 8457 and in both cases jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship.
In Case Number 8317, Beneo Plastics claims that Bryant Electric (a division of Westinghouse Electric Corp.) 1 misrepresented the quality and character of neon lampholders and that Bryant relied on such misrepresentations. Additionally, by way of amended complaint, Benco claims that Underwriters’ Laboratories (U.L.) misrepresented the quality and character of the same product when U.L. listed and made the representation…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Randy Knitwear, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Ford Motor Company v. LononTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Handler v. Remington Arms Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goodman v. PolandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Miller v. American Heavy Lift ShippingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Harold Heath Hill v. Basf Wyandotte CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Devine v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Board of Directors v. Southwestern Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.