Legal Opinion
In re Milo's Dog Treats Consolidated Cases
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 25, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-1011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.
On August 13, 2012, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C, 72.D and 72.G of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
On February 11, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued two Reports (Docs. 136 & 137), recommending that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 68 & 70) regarding Plaintiffs Funke and Ruff, respectively, be granted as to Plaintiffs’ claims for unjust enrichment, but otherwise denied. Service of the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Levit v. Nature's Bakery, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025