Legal Opinion

Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2015No. 14-4088Published

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0199p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ DINO RIKOS et al., ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellees, │ │ │ No. 14-4088 v. │ > │ THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, │ Defendant-Appellant. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati. No. 1:11-cv-00226—Timothy S. Black, District Judge. Argued: June 16, 2015 Decided and Filed: August 20, 2015 Before: MOORE and COOK, Circuit Judges; COHN, District Judge.* _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED:…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API