Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1986No. A021066PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

Appellant and cross-respondent, Harold F. Nelson, Jr. (hereafter Harold), appeals from portions of the interlocutory judgment dissolving his marriage to cross-appellant and respondent, Mary K. Nelson (hereafter Mary).

Both parties raise issues regarding property distributed in the judgment.

A large portion of the trial court’s decree involved the characterization and apportionment of stock options issued to Harold by his employer, the Ampex Corporation. 1 These fell into three separate categories: those that were granted and became exercisable before the parties separated;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. In Re Marriage of JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. In Re Marriage of SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Baccanti v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Marriage of HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. In Re the Marriage of KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API