In Re Marriage of Nelson
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
Appellant and cross-respondent, Harold F. Nelson, Jr. (hereafter Harold), appeals from portions of the interlocutory judgment dissolving his marriage to cross-appellant and respondent, Mary K. Nelson (hereafter Mary).
Both parties raise issues regarding property distributed in the judgment.
A large portion of the trial court’s decree involved the characterization and apportionment of stock options issued to Harold by his employer, the Ampex Corporation. 1 These fell into three separate categories: those that were granted and became exercisable before the parties separated;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Marriage of JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Marriage of SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Baccanti v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Marriage of HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re the Marriage of KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.