Legal Opinion
Hartsock v. Chrysler Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1989No. 88-229PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWolff, J.
R.C. 4123.519 provides in part:
“The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial commission or of its staff hearing officer made pursuant to division (B)(6) of section 4121.35 of the Revised Code in any injury or occupational disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas of the county in which the injury was inflicted * *
It has long been the law of Ohio that the requirement that the appeal be initiated in the county of injury is a jurisdictional requirement. Indus. Comm. v. Weigand (1934), 128 Ohio St. 463, 191 N.E. 696;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Jenkins v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Cadle v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Industrial Commission v. WeigandOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Hansford v. SteinbacherOhio Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mays v. Kroger CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. MortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Cox v. Stolle Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gdovichin v. Geauga County Highway DepartmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Clingerman v. MayfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.