Legal Opinion
Cox v. Stolle Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 4, 1990No. 11745PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrogan, J.
Robert R. Cox brought suit against his employer, Stolle Corporation, for an intentional tort, alleging that it had deliberately removed a safety guard from a machine which injured him. A jury trial was held on the issue of liability only, after the trial court ruled that it was precluded from ruling on damages by R.C. 4121.80(D). The jury found in favor of Cox. This matter is now before the court on Stolle’s timely notice of appeal from said judgment, and Cox’s cross-appeal. Stolle asserts three assignments of error, claiming that: (1) the trial court lacked jurisdiction over this matter, (2)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lantsberry v. Tilley Lamp Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ParkerHamilton County Municipal Court · 1994
- State v. Phillips, Unpublished Decision (9-3-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Cox v. Stolle Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991