Legal Opinion
Mays v. Kroger Company
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 1998No. Case No. CA98-04-080PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Koehler, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Loretta Mays, appeals a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendantappellee, Kroger Company (“Kroger”), in a workers’ compensation action.
Mays alleges that she contracted an occupational disease arising out of her employment as a cashier with Kroger. Mays’s alleged injury occurred in Butler County. Mays filed an application with the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation requesting allowance of her occupational disease claim. In January 1996, the Industrial Commission of Ohio denied Mays’s claim.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. Whitehouse Trucking Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- National Mutual Insurance v. PapenhagenOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Payton v. RehbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Industrial Commission v. WeigandOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Fuller v. FullerOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olynyk v. ScolesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Forshey v. Airborne Freight CorporationOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Williamson v. Scioto Twp. TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Topazio v. Acme Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Zumstein Mgmt. Co., Ca2008-06-010 (2-23-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009