Legal Opinion
Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. Staadt v. George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells, George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells v. Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. Staadt
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 9, 1967No. 7676Published
1Opinion of the Court
367 F.2d 851
Joseph R. HRADEL and Harold E. Staadt, Appellants,
v.
George L. GRIFFITH, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells, Appellees.
George L. GRIFFITH, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells, Appellants,
v.
Joseph R. HRADEL and Harold E. Staadt, Appellees.
Patent Appeal No. 7671.
Patent Appeal No. 7676.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
November 17, 1966.
Rehearing Denied February 9, 1967.
John A. Blair, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
James W. Dent, Washington, D. C. (William D. Lucas, New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. FennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Ferdinand J. RattiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Henry W. Rimbach v. Willem Lambertus Wanmaker and Cornelis BakkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.