Hradel v. Griffith
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge
This appeal and cross-appeal are from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Griffith et al., senior party in interference No. 92,370 involving Griffith et al. (hereinafter Griffith or appellees) application serial No. 770,302, filed October 29, 1958, entitled “Ammonium Nitrate Explosive Mixture” and PIradel et al. (hereinafter ITradel or appellants) application serial No. 784,881, filed January 5, 1959, entitled “Ammonium Nitrate Explosive Composition.” The single count adequately describes the invention:
An explosive composition consisting essentially of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. FennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Ferdinand J. RattiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Henry W. Rimbach v. Willem Lambertus Wanmaker and Cornelis BakkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Stuart W. Seeley v. John L. RennickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Koval v. BodenschatzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Tomecek v. StimpsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. Staadt v. George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells, George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells v. Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. StaadtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967