Legal Opinion
Pueblo of Jemez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2015No. 13-2181PublishedCited by 212 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
The history of Indian law and in particular “decisions of the Supreme Court recognizing the validity of original Indian title 1 make the existence and extent of such aboriginal ownership a relevant issue in title examinations whenever a chain of title is traced back to a federal grant or patent.” Felix S. Cohen, Original Indian Title, 32 Minn. L.Rev. 28, 43 (1947). 2 Not surprisingly, then, “[gjrantees who have relied on the Great Seal of a federal department as assuring the validity of land grant titles have not infrequently discover ed to their sorrow the truth of the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Khalik v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- Safe Streets Alliance v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Baker v. USD 229 Blue ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Oneida Indian Nation v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Pueblo of Jemez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- Fox v. Pittsburg State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.