Legal Opinion
United States v. Arnold Gemmill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1976No. 74-2809, 74-2965, 74-3062, 75-1019 to 75-1022PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS, HUFSTEDLER and SNEED, Circuit Judges. HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Indians challenge their convictions for theft of government property and for illegal occupancy of a national forest. Their consolidated appeals can be divided into two categories: the timber cases and the trespass cases.
On November 8, 1973, the three appellants 1 in the timber cases cut and carried away Christmas trees from the Shasta Trin ity National Forest. They claimed authority to do so under an authorization from the Pit River Indian Tribe, of which they are members and which, they contend,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- United States v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Delaware Nation v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Mary Dann Carrie Dann, United States of America v. Mary Dann Carrie DannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lyon v. Gila River Indian CommunityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
- Oneida Indian Nation of NY v. State of NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1981
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.