United States v. 31,600 Acres of Land
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMERMAN, District Judge.
This controversy concerns tract No. 213, which was condemned in the above entitled proceeding along with divers other tracts. The title to this tract of land is now vested in the government, and the compensation to be paid therefor has 'been fixed by a jury in this Court, “as of October 17, 1940, at Two Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty-five ($2,225) Dollars”. The ultimate issue for decision is: To whom shall the fixed compensation be paid?
The heirs at law of H. T. Dial are the claimants on one side and the heir at law of Ella Dial is the claimant on the other side.
It…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- McLeod v. TarrantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
- Sandford v. SandfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Wilson v. PostonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Groce v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- East Village New Deli Corp. v. United States Of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021