Legal Opinion

Groce v. Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 1932No. 13339PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabrer.

We have here two cases brought by the plaintiff, W. R. Groce, for damages alleged to have been sustained by him through trespass on his real estate; the cases having been tried together by consent. It appears that the defendants, Southern Railway Company and Atlanta & Charlotte Airline Railway Company, entered into an agreement, about February, 1926, with the defendant, Hardwood Manufacturing Company, by which they granted to the latter the right or license to use a portion of their right-of-way at Paris, S. C., “as a site or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. PostonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Rowell v. Gulf, M. O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Douglas v. Medical Investors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. Johnson v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Stylecraft, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API