Legal Opinion

Sandford v. Sandford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 8, 1917No. 9587PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Before Bowman, J., Orangeburg, July, 1916. Action by Sylvanus Sandford and others against Govan F. Sandford and others. Decree for defendant, Govan F. Sandford, and plaintiffs and certain other defendants appeal. cite: As to rule of construction: 102 S. C. 242; 75 S. C. 434. Conditions of sale part of habendum: 45 U. S. 353. “Heirs” as word of purchase: 36 S. C. 44; 14 S. E. 198; 10 S. E. 878; 94 S. C. 243; 104 S. C. 100. cite: As to construction of deed: 39 S. C. 280; 57 S.…

Read the full summary

Before Bowman, J., Orangeburg, July, 1916. Action by Sylvanus Sandford and others against Govan F. Sandford and others. Decree for defendant, Govan F. Sandford, and plaintiffs and certain other defendants appeal. cite: As to rule of construction: 102 S. C. 242; 75 S. C. 434. Conditions of sale part of habendum: 45 U. S. 353. “Heirs” as word of purchase: 36 S. C. 44; 14 S. E. 198; 10 S. E. 878; 94 S. C. 243; 104 S. C. 100. cite: As to construction of deed: 39 S. C. 280; 57 S. C. 175. Common law estates conveyed by deed: 88 S. C. 300; 76 S. C. 487; 51 S. C. 555; 46 S. C. 356; 102 S. C. 367; 101…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice ' Fraser.

Jesse Sandford conveyed to Govan Sandford a certain tract of land for a valuable consideration. The clause of the deed that is before us for construction reads as follows:

“To have and to hold all and singular the said premises before mentioned unto the said G. F. Sandford, his heirs and assigns, forever. The conditions of sale of the within piece of land are as follows: That the said G. F. Sandford is not to mortgage or in any wise dispose of said land.. And after his death it is to go to his wife and his and her children.”

The wife…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gowdy v. KelleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Cresswell v. Bank of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. White v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Sims v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Stylecraft, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API