Legal Opinion

Nick Bombard, Inc. v. Proctor

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1946No. 354PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

Appellee sued appellant for three times an alleged overcharge on the sale of a used automobile. The OPA maximum price for this automobile unwarranted 1 on the date of the sale was $490. The maximum price for the car warranted was $610, a difference of $120. Appellant sold at the higher price. The trial court, sitting without a jury, made a general finding in favor of appellee for three times the difference, plus a $50 attorney’s fee and costs. Defendant in the trial court has appealed.

The sale in controversy was made July 24, 1944. OPA Regulation MPR 540, Amendment 1,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Blackwell v. American Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Thierry v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  5. Friend v. HamillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Smedra v. StanekCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  3. In re C. D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Barnes v. Wheeler, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Guaranty Development Co. v. Circle Paving Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API