Smedra v. Stanek
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Zig Smedra, brought this action against Doctors Stanek and Matchett, for damages and expenses alleged to have resulted from negligent acts of the defendants in leaving “one or more sponges or pieces of surgical gauze in the person of the plaintiff” during an operation. The jury returned a verdict for defendants. From the judgment on the verdict Smedra has appealed.
A number of assignments are urged for reversal. The decision, however, turns on one question — did the trial court err in excluding relevant and material evidence as hearsay.
Smedra suffered a serious…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Rains v. RainsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Rice v. TissawArizona Supreme Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- James Kiernan and Mary Kiernan v. Gerald Van Schaik, T/a Van's Atlantic StationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City Of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- St. George Creaghe v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.