Legal Opinion
In re C. D.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 13, 1981No. Nos. 80-91, 80-303PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
The trial court found appellant, C.D. (who was seventeen at the time of the incident), guilty of taking indecent liberties with a child under the age of sixteen. See D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3501(a).1 Appellant raises three issues on appeal. First, he contends that the government charged him with rape, see id. § 22-2801,2 and, because taking indecent liberties is not a lesser included offense of rape, his conviction must be vacated. Next, appellant urges that the trial court erred by admitting into substantive evidence a statement by appellant’s companion telling appellant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Allen Allison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. BradfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Creek v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Murray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Evans-Reid v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Pounds v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Spain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Freeland v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.