Andresen v. Kirschner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
During the trial of this personal injury action, defense counsel, on cross-examination, elicited from plaintiff testimony admitting that he had previously asserted a claim based on the same motor vehicle accident against Kevin Leeks, who is not a party to this action, and had settled that claim. Although plaintiffs’ counsel successfully objected to inquiry into the amount of the settlement, no objection was made to the line of inquiry seeking to establish the fact of the settlement with Leeks. Nor did plaintiffs’ counsel make any effort, prior to verdict, to have the testimony concerning the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Horton v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Andresen v. KirschnerNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- Simon v. IndurskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Komsa v. Colonial Penn InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stevens v. AtwalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Miller v. SanchezCivil Court of the City of New York · 2004
- Assenza v. HorowitzNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Chevere v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010