Assenza v. Horowitz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J. Maltese, J.
The motion of Arthur Buonaspina, M.D. for summary judgment pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 32121 is denied. The cross motion for summary judgment made by Mark Horowitz, M.D. was supported by his own “expert” affidavit without adding impartial expert opinion. A “self-serving” affidavit requires scrutiny to assess its weight, but it is admissible. However, Dr. Horowitz failed to provide supporting proof to his cross motion2 and it is denied. Cross motion by Amanda Assenza and her father, David Assenza, to deny Dr. Buonaspina’s motion is…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.