Legal Opinion
Andresen v. Kirschner
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*780OPINION OF THE COURT
Kibbie F. Payne, J.
This is a posttrial application made by plaintiffs, Joseph Andresen and Adrienne Aridresen, for an order setting aside the verdict rendered on October 2, 2001 and for a new trial (CPLR 4404 [a]), on the ground that the defense counsel’s introduction of evidence concerning plaintiffs’ pretrial settlement with a nonparty, Kevin Leeks, violated CPLR 4547 and deprived plaintiffs of a fair trial. Subsequent to the motion being marked “default” in the motion support office, the trial attorney for defendants Hannah Kirschner, doing business as Hannah’s Moving,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coleman v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Tennant v. . DudleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Pellegrino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Hill v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Woodland v. CoteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stevens v. AtwalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Andresen v. KirschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Miller v. SanchezCivil Court of the City of New York · 2004
- Assenza v. HorowitzNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Chevere v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010