Legal Opinion

Horton v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1980PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the police officer’s testimony as to the point of impact was "without objection on the part of plaintiff”.

When a timely objection is not made, the testimony offered is presumed to have been unobjectionable and any alleged error considered waived. (CPLR 4017; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 4017.05, at pp 40-87 to 40-88.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

2Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BodianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Wiseman v. American Motors Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. State v. Timothy JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Hochhauser v. Electric InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Freeman v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API