Legal Opinion

United States v. Vega

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 15, 1989No. ACM 27746PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Staff Sergeant Vega raises two matters for our consideration,

*893I

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ACCEPTING APPELLANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY TO WRONGFUL POSSESSION OF COCAINE WHEN THE APPELLANT STATED DURING HIS GUILTY PLEA INQUIRY THAT AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED OFFENSE, HE DID NOT KNOW THAT THE SUBSTANCE HE POSSESSED WAS COCAINE.

II

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED TO THE SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF THE APPELLANT BY ADMITTING THE OPINION TESTIMONY OF MASTER SERGEANT MCCANTS CONCERNING APPELLANT’S POTENTIAL FOR REHABILITATION.

We affirm.*

I

Throughout his guilty plea inquiry on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. CokerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. BenoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. DomingueU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. HefnerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. MylesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. ParisoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  5. United States v. StringfellowU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API