United States v. Fell
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HAESSIG, Judge:
A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of felony-murder, robbery, and sodomy in violation of Articles 118,122, and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 918, 922, and 925 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], The appellant’s approved sentence includes a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-five years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the grade of Private E1.
I
Facts
On the afternoon of 30 January 1989, the appellant, a twenty-one year old married soldier, began drinking in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. ChambersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. McElroyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. KaopuaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. BirdsongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. MartinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993