Legal Opinion

United States v. Fell

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 31, 1991No. ACMR 8901992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HAESSIG, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of felony-murder, robbery, and sodomy in violation of Articles 118,122, and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 918, 922, and 925 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], The appellant’s approved sentence includes a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-five years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the grade of Private E1.

I

Facts

On the afternoon of 30 January 1989, the appellant, a twenty-one year old married soldier, began drinking in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. ChambersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. McElroyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. KaopuaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. BirdsongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. MartinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API