Legal Opinion

United States v. Pariso

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 31, 2007No. ACM 36671PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SOYBEL, Judge:

The appellant pled guilty at a general court-martial, comprised of a military judge, to wrongful use of Tylenol III in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 60 days, and reduction to E-1.

On appeal he raises two issues. First, the appellant asserts his guilty plea to wrongfully ingesting prescription medication is improvident because he stated during the Care inquiry that he thought he had been previously prescribed the medication, yet the military judge failed to explore the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. Tran Trong Cuong, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MullUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API