Legal Opinion
Frazier v. Davis
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided June 16, 1982No. CIV-2-82-108PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND CERTIFICATE
NEESE, District Judge.
The petitioner Mr. Dewey Scott Frazier applied pro se successively, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b); Rule 9(b), 28 U.S.C. fol. § 2254, for the federal writ of habeas corpus. He claims again that he is in the custody of the respondent-warden pursuant to the judgment of December 3, 1976 of the Criminal Court of Sullivan County, Tennessee in violation of the federal Constitution. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a).
It was held on November 18,1981, on the clear and particular plea of the respondent, that, with reference to the same conviction, Mr. Frazier’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Pearson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Athel Robert Gemmel v. Raymond J. Buchkoe, Warden, State House of Correction and Branch PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Marie Kobus, et al. v. The Procter & Gamble CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Pulver Macz Funeral Home, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2026
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008