Pearson v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case in order to clarify the law with respect to the use of criminal convictions as a predicate for successive convictions under the habitual criminal statutes (Sec. 40-2801 et seq., T.C.A.).
The record reflects convictions of the petitioner as follows:
a. Sept. 16, 1964 armed robbery
b. Sept. 16, 1964 burglary
c. Dec. 2, 1964 armed robbery
d. April 26, 1973 armed robbery
e. April 26, 1973 habitual criminal
f. August 2, 1973 armed robbery
g. August 2, 1973 habitual criminal
The first three enumerated convictions resulted in the April 1973 conviction…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Shurtleff v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Harrison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- State v. McAfeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- State v. DobbinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- State v. LinamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.