Marie Kobus, et al. v. The Procter & Gamble Company

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIE KOBUS, et al., Case No. 25-cv-00770-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 30 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. See Dkt. No. 30 (“Mot.”); 14 Dkt. No. 33 (“Opp.”); Dkt. No. 35 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for 15 disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For 16 the reasons discussed below, the…