Legal Opinion

SEC v. Patel, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 30, 2009No. 07-CV-039-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SEC v . Patel, et a l . 07-CV-039-SM 09/30/09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff v. Civil N o . 07-cv-39-SM Opinion N o .

2009 DNH 143

Piyush G. Patel, David J. Kirkpatrick; Eric Jaeger; Lawrence Collins; Michael A . Skubisz; and Jerry A . Shanahan, Defendants O R D E R A number of dispositive motions are pending. Because the case’s procedural history provides some context for their resolution, it is briefly summarized. In response to the SEC’s original complaint, four defendants filed motions to dismiss, which were granted…

2Cases cited49 opinions

Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

SEC v. Allen SmithDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015