State Commission in Lunacy v. Welch
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment rendered upon demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of San Benito County. M. T. Dooling, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against plaintiff, after order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition for a writ of mandate. The record affirmatively shows that no application for leave to amend was made.
Plaintiff filed its petition against defendant, as treasurer of the county of San Benito, asking for a writ of mandate to compel defendant, as such treasurer, to pay the state treasurer the sum of $1,460, claimed to be due the state on account of the commitment to, and maintenance in, the Sonoma State Home, of certain children from said county.
The second amended…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Ferry v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Johnson v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Bates v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Board of Social Welfare v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Francis v. BarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.