Legal Opinion

Neisler v. Keirsbilck

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2010No. SD 30036PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

Donna Neisler (“Appellant”) appeals the judgment entered by the trial court which granted Columbia Sussex Corporation’s (“Respondent”) request for summary judgment. 1 Appellant urges three points of trial court error.

In determining whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment, we employ a de novo standard of review. City of Springfield v. Gee, 149 S.W.3d 609, 612 (Mo.App.2004). Consequently, we do not defer to the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment. Murphy v. Jackson Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 83 S.W.3d 663, 665 (Mo.App.2002). Instead, we use the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc. v. Dodson International Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. Murphy v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re McDonald Revocable TrustMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. City of Springfield v. GeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rapp v. Eagle Plumbing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Bilyeu v. VAILLMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In re H.N.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Baca Chiropractic, P.C. v. CobbMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API