Legal Opinion
Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 6, 1947No. Civ. Nos. 3046, 4216PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McVICAR, District Judge.
The above actions consolidated for trial and all subsequent proceedings by order of March 14,(1947, involve suits by plaintiff to recover royalties alleged to be due the plaintiff from the defendant under a patent license agreement dated December 8, 1932. Defendant set up as a defense that the actions are barred by the Royalty Adjustment Act of October 31, 1942, 35 U.S. C.A. § 89 et seq. After final hearing, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
Findings of Fact
1. Roscoe A. Coffman (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) is a resident…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ogden City v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. AtcherleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. Alma Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Harms, Inc. v. Tops Music Enterprises, Inc. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948