Legal Opinion
Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. Alma Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 7, 1944No. 8300PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act1 by the TimkenDetroit Axle Company (herein called “Timken”) against Alma Motor Company (herein called “Alma”). The plaintiff in the action sought a declaration that certain patents owned by Alma covering a mechanism known as a “transfer case” which Alma had licensed Timken to use for a stipulated royalty were invalid and further that transfer cases manufactured by it did not come within the scope of the license agreement so as to require payment of royalties. Alma counterclaimed for damages on account of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Roberts Dairy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Automatic Paper Machinery Co. v. Marcalus Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.