Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Lynch

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1932No. Docket Nos. 866, 867PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOVEL, J., pro tem.

There are two actions involved in this litigation. Judgment was entered in each in favor of the defendant and appeals were perfected from both judgments. Upon stipulation of counsel and an order of this court the appeals have been consolidated for hearing and determination.

It appears that in the year 1918, defendant was the owner of 3,000 shares of stock in the Benson Timber Company, an Oregon corporation, and 300 shares in the Benson Lumber Company, later reorganized as a California corporation. These shares represented three-fifths of the total issued capital stock of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Calkins v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Jean v. JeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Slaker v. McCormick-saeltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hogeberg v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Gordon v. BarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Jackson v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Frazier v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Copeland v. CraigSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API