Legal Opinion
Shelley v. Board of Trade
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1927No. Docket No. 6005PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
In February, 1922, the appellant, Joseph Shelley, and his brother, Sam Shelley, were copartners and were engaged in operating “Army Stores” in San Francisco, Fresno, Eureka, Pittsburg, and Stockton, California, and at Reno, Nevada. They owed large sums of money and were in financial difficulties and their creditors were uneasy. Joseph Shelley and his brother, Sam Shelley, feared they would be pressed by their creditors. Accordingly, they conferred with Mr. Elkus, a member of the Board of Trade of San Francisco, about the situation and Mr. Elkus arranged a meeting of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Ames v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Texas Company v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Western Pac. R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Katsivalis v. Serrano Reconveyance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kerner v. Hughes Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Los Angeles Soap Co. v. BossenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.