Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wright v. Weyandt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1977No. 76-1152PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Bkown, J.

The sole issue raised by this cause is whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing respondent Weyandt (1) “to adjust the pay” of relators “to reflect all across-the-board increases granted during the period of termination” and (2) “to restore relators-appel-lants to their former positions or positions of comparable degree and to restore them to the rank held on termination.”

In State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, paragraph one of the syllabus, the prerequisites of an action in mandamus are set forth as follows:

*196“Where a public -officer or agency is under a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Gibler v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1846
  4. State ex rel. Dean v. HuddleOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Assn. v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cedar Fair, L.P. v. Falfas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API