State ex rel. Wright v. Weyandt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Bkown, J.
The sole issue raised by this cause is whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing respondent Weyandt (1) “to adjust the pay” of relators “to reflect all across-the-board increases granted during the period of termination” and (2) “to restore relators-appel-lants to their former positions or positions of comparable degree and to restore them to the rank held on termination.”
In State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, paragraph one of the syllabus, the prerequisites of an action in mandamus are set forth as follows:
*196“Where a public -officer or agency is under a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Gibler v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- State ex rel. Dean v. HuddleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by35 opinions
- Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Assn. v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Cedar Fair, L.P. v. Falfas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.