Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
This court must decide whether a party to a settlement agreement who becomes obligated thereby to perform, can insist that the obligee accept such performance despite the filing of a satisfaction of judgment. We hold that unless the language employed in the agreed judgment incorporating a settlement specifically requires the obligee to accept the obligor’s performance, the obligee need not accept the performance, but need only conclude the litigation.
I
Initially, we address the standard of review to be applied to rulings on a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. The court of appeals…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
- Mack v. Polson Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bolen v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State ex rel. Wright v. WeyandtOhio Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by78 opinions
- Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Assn. v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- Chirchiglia v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lewis v. MathesOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Columbus Finance, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.