Legal Opinion

Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Assn. v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 1994-1618PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 501.] CONTINENTAL WEST CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSN., APPELLANT, v. HOWARD E. FERGUSON, INC.; AIRKO, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Assn. v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.,

1996-Ohio-158.] Civil procedure—Contracts—Settlement agreements—Obligee need not accept the performance, but need only conclude the litigation, when. Unless the language employed in the agreed judgment incorporating a settlement specifically requires the obligee to accept the obligor’s performance, the obligee need not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Continental West Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mack v. Polson Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bolen v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Wright v. WeyandtOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. In re All Kelley & Ferraro Asbestos CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Infinite Security Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties II, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Turoczy Bonding Co. v. Mitchell, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  4. Union Savings Bank v. Lawyers Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & GambelOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API