Hawks v. EPI Products USA, Inc.

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED JULY 31, 1996 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered foñowing a jury trial in a products Habifity action. The defendants/appeüants, EPI Products U.S.A., Inc. (EPI), Fred Meyer, Inc. (Fred Meyer), and Mepro Electric, Inc. (Mepro),1 appeal the district court’s determination that EPI is a manufacturer pursuant to section 6-1402(2) of the Idaho Code.2 The appeñants also chaüenge the trial court’s exclusion of an expert witness’s testimony, as well as the court’s admission of testimony from a witness…