Legal Opinion
Aaron Coleman and Mendy Coleman, Husband and Wife v. Sig Sauer, Inc.; Palmetto State Armory, LLC; and Does I-X, unknown parties
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 23, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00650Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO AARON COLEMAN and MENDY Case No. 1:25-cv-00650-AKB COLEMAN, Husband and Wife, MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiffs, AND ORDER v. SIG SAUER, INC.; PALMETTO STATE ARMORY, LLC; and DOES I-X, unknown parties, Defendants. Pending before the Court is Defendants Sig Sauer, Inc. (Sig Sauer) and Palmetto State Armory, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. 6). After reviewing the record and the parties’ submissions, the Court finds the briefs adequately present the facts and legal arguments and concludes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Scarangella v. Thomas Built Buses, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.