Legal Opinion

Bloching v. Albertson's, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1997No. 22858PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Carl Bloching (Bloching) filed a negligence action against Albertson’s, Inc. He alleged that a pharmacist for Albertson’s offered a beef-pork insulin blend as a substitute for Blocking’s prescription of beef insulin and that this substitution caused Bloching to experience hypoglycemic seizures, resulting in permanent injuries. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Albertson’s, and Bloching appealed. We affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment.

In February 1992, Blocking’s girlfriend, Sheila Dutey…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Evans v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Flowerdew v. WarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Roberts v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Swallow v. Emergency Medicine of Idaho, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Coombs v. CurnowIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gooby v. Lake Shore Management Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Harrison v. BinnionIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API