Legal Opinion
Ryncarz v. Eikenberry
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided June 25, 1993No. CY-92-3061-JBHPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, IN PART, INTER ALIA
HOVIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Ct. Rec. 30) and the defendants’ motion to dismiss (Ct.Rec. 34).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Plaintiff alleges that various of his constitutional rights were violated when the defendants required him to submit to a blood draw pursuant to the State of Washington’s DNA identification program. RCW 43.43.754 states:
After July 1,1990, every individual convicted in a Washington superior court of a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rise v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Landry v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Gaines v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.