Legal Opinion
Rise v. Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1995No. 93-35521PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge D.W. NELSON.
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit appeal the district court’s summary judgment dismissing their claims. We have jurisdiction and affirm.
I
Chapter 669, Oregon Laws 1991, O.R.S. §§ 137.076, 161.325(4), 181.085, 419.507(11), and 419.800(4)(k), requires persons convicted of murder, a sexual offense,1 or conspiracy or attempt to commit a sexual offense to submit a blood sample to the Oregon Department of Corrections (“DOC”). O.R.S. § 137.076. DOC uses the blood that is submitted to create a deoxyribonucleic…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Crowe v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- United States v. Paul G. SczubelekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.