Legal Opinion
D & D CO. v. Kaufman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 6, 1996No. 94-03382; CA A87983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that claimant’s claim for a middle and low back condition was not barred by a Claim Disposition Agreement (CDA). We reverse.
Claimant, a truck driver, compensably injured his middle and low back on April 3, 1992, in a collision with an automobile. Claimant received time loss benefits for five days and then returned to regular work. The claim was closed on July 16, 1992, with no award for permanent disability.
On August 12, 1992, claimant lifted a water cooler at work and again injured his middle and low back. He was treated by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Trevitts v. Hoffman-MarmolejoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- P & C Construction Co. v. American Diversified/Wells Park IICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schray v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Stanley Contracting, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2005
- Hoyt Street Properties, L.L.C. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1999
- Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc. v. Oregon Worsted CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025