Legal Opinion

Hoyt Street Properties, L.L.C. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Santa Fe Railway Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 14, 1999No. CIV. 98-1198-ASPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ASHMANSKAS, United States Magistrate Judge.

This action raises the issue of who is legally responsible for the costs incurred in the environmental clean up of real property referred to by the parties as the Hoyt Street railyard (the “Property”). Hoyt Street Properties, L.L.C., an Oregon limited liability company (“Plaintiff’), is the present owner of the Property. Defendant Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company (“Defendant”), or its predecessors, owned and occupied the Property from 1906 to 1988. In 1988, Defendant sold the Property to Glacier Park Company, a wholly-owned…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Country Mutual Insurance v. PittmanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API